Economic and clinical burden of managing transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia in the United States.
Chuka UdezeKristin A EvansYoojung YangTimothy LillehaugenJanna ManjelievskaiaUrvi MujumdarNanxin LiBiree AndemariamPublished in: Journal of medical economics (2023)
Aims: To describe clinical complications, treatment use, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs among patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT) in the United States. Materials and methods: Merative MarketScan Databases were used to identify patients with β-thalassemia between March 1, 2010, and March 1, 2019. Patients were eligible for inclusion with ≥1 inpatient claim or ≥2 outpatient claims for β-thalassemia and ≥8 red blood cell transfusions (RBCTs) during any 12-month period after and including the date of the first qualifying TDT diagnosis code. Matched controls consisted of individuals without β-thalassemia. Clinical and economic outcomes of patients were assessed during ≥12 months of follow-up, defined as the period from the index date (i.e. the first RBCT) to either the end of continuous enrollment in benefits, inpatient death, or March 1, 2020. Results: Overall, 207 patients with TDT and 1,035 matched controls were identified. Most patients received iron chelation therapy (ICT) (91.3%), with a mean of 12.1 (standard deviation [SD] = 10.3) ICT claims per-patient-per-year (PPPY). Many also received RBCTs, with a mean of 14.2 (SD = 4.7) RBCTs PPPY. TDT was associated with higher annual ($137,125) and lifetime ($7.1 million) healthcare costs vs. matched controls ($4,183 and $235,000, respectively). Annual costs were driven by ICT (52.1%) and RBCT use (23.6%). Patients with TDT had 7-times more total outpatient visits/encounters, 3-times more prescriptions, and 33-times higher total annual costs than matched controls. Limitations: This analysis may underestimate the burden of TDT, as indirect healthcare costs (e.g. absenteeism, presenteeism, etc.) were not included. Results may not be generalizable to patients excluded from this analysis, including those with other types of insurance or without insurance. Conclusions: Patients with TDT have high HCRU and direct healthcare costs. Treatments that eliminate the need for RBCTs could reduce the clinical and economic burden of managing TDT.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- health insurance
- risk factors
- mental health
- stem cells
- sickle cell disease
- mesenchymal stem cells
- machine learning
- red blood cell
- palliative care
- metabolic syndrome
- patient reported
- deep learning
- cell therapy
- weight loss
- big data