Login / Signup

Should aortic stiffness parameters be used in MIS-C patient follow-up?

Hatice UygunCelal VaranCapan KoncaNurettin ErdemTanyeli Guneyligil KazazMehmet Turgut
Published in: The international journal of cardiovascular imaging (2024)
We evaluated the short- and long-term effects of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) on their cardiovascular system. The study population consisted of 38 MIS-C patients and 55 control patients. Standard echocardiographic measurements and aortic stiffness parameters were compared between the two groups at different time points. During the standard echocardiographic examination at the time of diagnosis, mitral valve insufficiency was detected in 42% of the cases, left ventricular systolic dysfunction in 36%, aortic valve insufficiency in 3%, tricuspid valve insufficiency in 13%, and coronary artery dilatation in 31%. The ejection fraction, pulse pressure of the experimental group were significantly lower than the control group (p < 0.01, p = 0.045, respectively). When aortic stiffness parameters were compared, it was seen that the parameters increased in the experimental group and the difference was significant for aortic distensibility. (p = 0.105, p = 0.029 respectively). When comparing the experimental group's results at diagnosis and at the sixth month, there was a decrease in aortic stiffness parameters at the sixth month compared to the time of diagnosis, but the difference wasn't significant (p = 0.514, p = 0.334). However, no statistically significant difference was detected when comparing the aortic distensibility results of the experimental group with the control group at the sixth month (p = 0.667). Our results showed that many pathological echocardiographic findings detected at diagnosis in MIS-C patients returned to normal within six months. Therefore, we believe that the cardiovascular follow-up period of MIS-C cases should be at least six months.
Keyphrases