Login / Signup

Potential of four definitions of metabolic syndrome to discriminate individuals with different 10-year cardiovascular disease risk scores: a cross-sectional analysis of an Iranian cohort.

Mohammad Javad ZibaeenezhadMehrab SayadiAli Karimi-AkhormehAli ArdekaniNader ParsaIman Razeghian Jahromi
Published in: BMJ open (2022)
IDF was not the appropriate definition for discrimination of subjects with Mets and/or those at high risk of future cardiovascular events. AHA, WHO and NCEP ATP III definitions were effective to discriminate subjects with Mets from peers without Mets.
Keyphrases
  • cardiovascular events
  • cardiovascular disease
  • metabolic syndrome
  • coronary artery disease
  • cardiovascular risk factors
  • current status
  • type diabetes
  • insulin resistance
  • uric acid