Benefits of NGS in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Vary by Populations and Timing of Examination.
Po-Hsin LeeWei-Fan OuYen-Hsiang HuangKuo-Hsuan HsuJeng-Sen TsengGee-Chen ChangTsung-Ying YangPublished in: International journal of molecular sciences (2024)
Despite the widespread application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in advanced lung adenocarcinoma, its impact on survival and the optimal timing for the examination remain uncertain. This cohort study included advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who underwent NGS testing. We categorized patients into four groups: Group 1: treatment-naïve, upfront NGS; Group 2: Treatment-naïve, exclusionary EGFR / ALK / ROS1 ; Group 3: post-treatment, no known EGFR / ALK / ROS1 ; Group 4: known driver mutation and post-TKI treatment. A total of 424 patients were included. There were 128, 126, 90, and 80 patients in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. In Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, targetable mutations were identified in 76.6%, 49.2%, 41.1%, and 33.3% of the patients, respectively ( p < 0.001). Mutation-targeted treatments were applied in 68.0%, 15.1%, 27.8%, and 22.5% of the patients, respectively ( p < 0.001). In the overall population, patients receiving mutation-targeted treatments exhibited significantly longer overall survival (OS) (aHR 0.54 [95% CI 0.37-0.79], p = 0.001). The most profound benefit was seen in the Group 1 patients (not reached vs. 40.4 months, p = 0.028). The median OS of patients with mutation-targeted treatments was also significantly longer among Group 2 patients. The median post-NGS survival of patients receiving mutation-targeted treatments was numerically longer in Group 3 and Group 4 patients. In conclusion, mutation-targeted therapy is associated with a favorable outcome. However, the opportunities of NGS-directed treatment and the survival benefits of mutation-targeted treatment were various among different populations.