Login / Signup

Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.

Kate T SimmsMichaela HallMegan A SmithJie-Bin LewSuzanne HughesSusan YuillIan HammondMarion SavilleKaren Canfell
Published in: PloS one (2017)
In primary HPV screening programs, partial genotyping for HPV16/18 or high-grade triage cytology in OHR HPV positive women can be used to refer the highest risk group to colposcopy, but 12-month follow-up for women with OHR HPV and low-grade cytology is associated with a low risk of developing cervical cancer. Direct referral to colposcopy for this group would be associated with a substantial increase in colposcopy referrals and the associated harms, and is also cost-ineffective; thus, 12-month surveillance for women with OHR HPV and low-grade cytology provides the best balance between benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness.
Keyphrases
  • high grade
  • low grade
  • public health
  • fine needle aspiration
  • insulin resistance
  • polycystic ovary syndrome
  • cervical cancer screening
  • ultrasound guided