Login / Signup

Researchers' views on, and experiences with, the requirement to obtain informed consent in research involving human participants: a qualitative study.

Antonia XuMelissa Therese BaysariSophie Lena StockerLiang Joo LeowRichard Osborne DayJane Ellen Carland
Published in: BMC medical ethics (2020)
This study highlights the importance of transparent relationships, both between researchers and participants, and between researchers and HRECs. Where the relationship with study participants was reported as more robust, researchers felt that they were better able to ensure participants made better, more informed decisions. Where the relationship with HRECs was reported as more robust, researchers were more likely to view them as institutional safeguards, rather than as bureaucratic hindrances. Conscientious and mindful researchers are paramount to ensuring the procedure accommodates individual requirements. This study advocates that when designing ethical informed consent practices, researchers should be integrated as autonomous players with a positive input on the process, rather than, in the worst case, predatory recruiters to be curtailed by information forms and oversight.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • primary care
  • endothelial cells