Consecutive Esotropia with and without Abduction Limitation - Risk Factors and Surgical Outcomes of Lateral Rectus Advancement.

Purpose: To identify risk factors for abduction limitation in consecutive esotropia following surgical correction of exotropia. To study outcomes of lateral rectus advancement for consecutive esotropia correction.Methods: Patients with consecutive esotropia (>10PD) operated between 2007 and 2019 with a minimum follow-up of 2 months were reviewed retrospectively. Preoperative and postoperative alignment and ocular motility were recorded. Patients were classified into those with full abduction (group-A) and with abduction limitation (group-B). Success was defined as deviation ≤10 PD of esotropia or exotropia in the primary position.Results: Forty-cases fulfilled the inclusion criteria (group-A = 28 and group-B = 12). Median age at surgery was five years, median consecutive esotropia was 20PD and follow-up was 29.18 months. Abduction limitation (group-B) was associated with constant exotropia (p = .01) and larger bilateral lateral rectus recession (group-A = 13 mm, group-B = 15 mm; p = .04). Nineteen patients underwent lateral rectus advancement (group-A = 12, group-B = 7), one underwent medial-rectus recession and two were excluded due to lack of postoperative follow-up. Five patients had spontaneous resolution with good alignment (group-A = 3, group-B = 2), two refused surgery, three were observed and eight were lost to follow-up. Success following second surgery was similar in both groups (group-A = 86%, group-B = 77%)(p = 1).Conclusion: Constant exotropia and larger lateral rectus recession were associated with abduction limitation in consecutive esotropia. Lateral rectus advancement produced good outcomes irrespective of abduction limitation.