Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: An assessment of the quality of testing in North American laboratories.
Jameel AbdulrehmanYonah C ZiembaPeihong HsuElizabeth M Van CottElizabeth A PlumhoffPiet MeijerMartine J HollestelleRita SelbyPublished in: Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia (2021)
Imprecision was lowest for VWF antigen and highest for collagen binding activity (CBA) with median coefficient of variation (CV) of 12% (interquartile range (IQR) 7%) and 23% (IQR 21%) respectively. Within the VWF PBA assays, the gain-of-function mutant GP1b binding (VWF: GP1bM) methods had the least imprecision (CV 9%, IQR 10%). All assays, including the various PBA methods had excellent consensus. The majority of laboratories agreed that normal (median consensus-82%, IQR 16%) and T1 VWD (median consensus-100%, IQR 9%) samples had normal multimer distribution. Consensus among laboratories for final interpretations was excellent for normal samples (median 81%, IQR 8%), good for T1 VWD samples (median 59%, IQR 9%), and fair for T2 VWD samples (median 44%, IQR 21%). Consensus on final interpretation decreased as sample complexity increased.