Login / Signup

Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review.

Jan-Ole HesselbergTherese K DalsbøHilde StrommeIda SvegeAtle Fretheim
Published in: The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2023)
Evidence from 10 RCTs suggests that training peer reviewers may lead to little or no improvement in the quality of peer review. There is a need for studies with more participants and a broader spectrum of valid and reliable outcome measures. Studies evaluating stakeholders' assessments of the quality of peer review should ensure that these instruments have sufficient levels of validity and reliability.
Keyphrases
  • virtual reality
  • quality improvement