Lifting the veil on stroke outcomes: revisiting stroke centers' transparency through public reporting of metrics.
Kyle M FargenJames L WestJ MoccoPublished in: Journal of neurointerventional surgery (2018)
Public reporting of healthcare metrics provides transparency that allows patients and emergency medical providers to make informed decisions about where patients should receive care. Most previous reports about public reporting of health metrics have demonstrated significant improvements in outcome metrics after implementation. However, no mechanism exists, voluntary or otherwise, for the public reporting of outcomes of stroke care. We review the components of public reporting of health outcomes data and its limited history in stroke outcomes. We summarize the literature on public reporting in cardiovascular interventions, particularly percutaneous coronary interventions, as a close corollary to mechanical neurothrombectomy. The benefits, limitations, and controversies associated with reporting of cardiovascular outcomes are reviewed with a focus on the development of risk-avoidant behaviors. This article serves as a primer for discussion of the potential benefits, limitations, and unintended consequences of public reporting of stroke data.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- adverse drug
- electronic health record
- atrial fibrillation
- mental health
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- systematic review
- emergency department
- chronic kidney disease
- primary care
- prognostic factors
- physical activity
- quality improvement
- coronary artery
- coronary artery disease
- pain management
- public health
- type diabetes
- big data
- health information
- subarachnoid hemorrhage
- patient reported outcomes
- deep learning
- left ventricular