Login / Signup

Treatment patterns and outcomes of 2310 patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia: a PETHEMA registry study.

David Martínez-CuadrónJuan Eduardo Megías-VericatJosefina SerranoPilar Martínez-SánchezEduardo Rodríguez-ArbolíCristina GilEliana AguiarJuan-Miguel BerguaJose L Lopez-LorenzoTeresa BernalAna EspadanaMercedes ColoradoCarlos Rodríguez-MedinaMaría López-PaviaMar TormoJesus Lorenzo AlgarraMaria Luz AmigoMaria Jose SayasJorge LabradorJuan I Rodríguez-GutiérrezCelina Benavente CuestaLissette Costilla-BarrigaRaimundo García-BoyeroEsperanza Lavilla-RubiraSusana VivesPilar HerreraDaniel García BelmonteMaría Mar Herráez-AlbendeaGraça V EstevesMaría Isabel Gómez-RonceroAna CabelloGuiomar BautistaAmaia BalerdiJosé Mário MarizBlanca BoludaMiguel A SanzPau Montesinos
Published in: Blood advances (2021)
Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) comprises a heterogeneous group of patients, and is associated with poor overall survival (OS). We analyze the characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of sAML adult patients of the Programa Español de Tratamientos en Hematología (PETHEMA) registry. Overall, 6211 (72.9%) were de novo and 2310 (27.1%) sAML, divided into myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS-AML, 44%), MDS/myeloproliferative (MDS/MPN-AML, 10%), MPN-AML (11%), therapy-related (t-AML, 25%), and antecedent neoplasia without prior chemotherapy/radiotherapy (neo-AML, 9%). Compared to de novo, sAML were older (median age 69 years old), had more ECOG ≥2 (35%) or high-risk cytogenetics (40%), less FLT3-ITD (11%) and NPM1 mutations (21%), and received less intensive chemotherapy regimens (38%) (all P<0.001). Median OS was higher in de novo than in sAML (10.9 vs 5.6 months, P<0.001); and shorter in sAML after hematologic disorder (MDS, MDS/MPN or MPN) as compared to t-AML and neo-AML (5.3 vs 6.1 vs 5.7 months, respectively, P=0.04). After intensive chemotherapy, median OS was better among de novo and neo-AML patients (17.2 and 14.6 months). No OS differences were observed after hypomethylating agents according to type of AML. sAML was as an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS. We confirm high prevalence and adverse features of sAML and we establish its independent adverse prognostic value. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02607059.
Keyphrases