Login / Signup

A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis of the Use of Remote Biochemical Verification Methods of Smoking Status in Tobacco Research.

Johannes ThrulCarol L HoweJanardan DevkotaAdam AlexanderAlicia M AllenMichael S BusinelleEmily T Hebért ArsersJaimee L HeffnerDarla E KendzorChaelin K RaJudith S Gordon
Published in: Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (2022)
This scoping review and meta-analysis included studies using remote biochemical verification to determine smoking status. Challenges exist regarding implementation and ensuring high sample return rates. Higher self-reported compared to biochemically verified abstinence rates suggest the possibility that participants in remote studies may be misreporting abstinence or not returning samples for other reasons (e.g., participant burden, inconvenience). Remote biochemical confirmation of self-reported smoking abstinence should be included in smoking cessation studies whenever feasible. However, findings should be considered in the context of challenges to sample return rates. Better reporting guidelines for future studies in this area are needed.
Keyphrases
  • smoking cessation
  • replacement therapy
  • case control
  • primary care
  • healthcare
  • risk factors