Computational quality-by-design strategy to validate high-performance liquid chromatography method for the estimation of meloxicam in bulk dosage forms and milk samples.
Vaskuri G S Sainaga JyothiHarithasree VeerabommaChantibabu KattaJitender MadanPublished in: Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry (2023)
Bovine clinical mastitis has significant repercussions for farmers across the globe. Meloxicam, a COX-2 inhibitor, attenuates mastitis symptoms and is also approved for veterinary use. An RP-HPLC (Reverse Phase-High Performance Liquid Chromatography) method development and validation is essential in the pharmaceutical industry to assess API (Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient) quantity present in the pharmaceutical dosage forms. RP-HPLC method of meloxicam was developed and optimized with the aid of QbD (Quality by Design) using Box-Behnken design (BBD). The pH of the aqueous mobile phase, acetonitrile (ACN) percentage, and column temperature were chosen as influence variables, and retention time (R T ) and tailing factor (T f ) were selected as response variables. The optimum experimental conditions were selected as pH ~ 3 of the aqueous mobile phase, 65% v/v ACN, and 30˚C as column temperature. The drug was eluted at 6.02 min R T with 1.18 as T f . The method was subjected to validation for accuracy, linearity, precision, range, sensitivity, and robustness and was found to comply with ICH Q2 (R1) guidelines. The in vitro bioequivalent studies were performed in hydrochloric acid, pH ~ 1.2; acetate buffer, pH ~ 4.5; and phosphate buffer, pH ~ 6.8 for two veterinary brands of meloxicam tablets, and their release profiles were compared by mathematical models. Both the brands, brand 1 and 2 exhibited significant (Unpaired t-test, P < 0.05) differences in dissolution efficiency (DE) and mean dissolution time (MDT) except DE at pH 1.2. However, brands 1 and 2 showed similarity (f 2 > 50) in terms of release of meloxicam except at pH 6.8 (f2 = 47.01). The in vitro release of meloxicam followed Peppas kinetics except for brand 2 at pH 6.8, where it followed the Higuchi model. Moreover, the recovery of meloxicam extracted with ACN in the milk sample was estimated to be 99.67 ± 0.58% significantly (Unpaired t-test, P < 0.05) higher than 90.34 ± 6.77% extracted with methanol. In conclusion, the optimized and validated RP-HPLC method of meloxicam may further be used for the analysis of drug content in pharmaceutical dosage forms in addition to biological fluids.