Assessment of Bone Healing Opportunities to Improve the Standard of Care.
Mohammad Javad ShariyateNadim KheirDaniela CaroMohammadreza AbbasianEdward K RodriguezBrian D SnyderAra NazarianPublished in: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume (2023)
➤ Bone healing is commonly evaluated by clinical examination and serial radiographic evaluation. Physicians should be mindful that personal and cultural differences in pain perception may affect the clinical examination. Radiographic assessment, even with the Radiographic Union Score, is qualitative, with limited interobserver agreement.➤ Physicians may use serial clinical and radiographical examinations to assess bone healing in most patients, but in ambiguous and complicated cases, they may require other methods to provide assistance in decision-making.➤ In complicated instances, clinically available biomarkers, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging may determine initial callus development. Quantitative computed tomography and finite element analysis can estimate bone strength in later callus consolidation phases.➤ As a future direction, quantitative rigidity assessments for bone healing may help patients to return to function earlier by increasing a clinician's confidence in successful progressive healing.
Keyphrases
- magnetic resonance imaging
- bone mineral density
- computed tomography
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- primary care
- healthcare
- soft tissue
- bone regeneration
- chronic kidney disease
- prognostic factors
- chronic pain
- peritoneal dialysis
- multiple sclerosis
- bone loss
- pain management
- palliative care
- patient reported
- finite element analysis
- health insurance
- body composition
- patient reported outcomes
- spinal cord injury
- contrast enhanced
- neuropathic pain
- dual energy