Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Endovascular Therapy for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: A Scoping Review.
Wenzhuo MengJulong GuoDikang PanLianrui GuoYongquan GuPublished in: Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2023)
This review summarized a few available studies to promote understanding of IVUS and reveal its potential. This novel technology shows the possibility of achieving better clinical outcomes than angiography in femoropopliteal artery lesions endovascular therapy such as higher 12-month primary patency rate shown in some studies. Currently, it is important to consider suitable technologies applied to individualized treatment. IVUS seems to provide clinicians additional option in clinical practice and benefit patients well in the future. And it needs us to conduct more high-quality studies to explore its roles and advantages in endovascular treatment.
Keyphrases
- endovascular treatment
- optical coherence tomography
- case control
- end stage renal disease
- clinical practice
- ultrasound guided
- computed tomography
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- palliative care
- prognostic factors
- coronary artery
- gene expression
- single cell
- genome wide
- mesenchymal stem cells
- combination therapy
- patient reported
- peripheral artery disease