Meropenem vs standard of care for treatment of neonatal late onset sepsis (NeoMero1): A randomised controlled trial.
Irja LutsarCorine ChazallonUrsula TrafojerVincent Meiffredy de CabreCinzia AuritiChiara BertainaFrancesca Ippolita Calo CarducciFuat Emre CanpolatSusanna EspositoIsabelle FournierMaarja HallikPaul T HeathMari-Liis IlmojaElias IosifidisJelena KuznetsovaLaurence MeyerTuuli MetsvahtGeorge MitsiakosZoi Dorothea PanaFabio MoscaLorenza PugniEmmanuel RoilidesPaolo RossiKosmas SarafidisLaura SanchezMichael SharlandVytautas UsonisAdilia WarrisJean-Pierre AboulkerCarlo Giaquintonull nullPublished in: PloS one (2020)
Within this study population, we found no evidence that meropenem was superior to SOC in terms of success at TOC, short term hearing disturbances, safety or mortality were similar in both treatment arms but the study was underpowered to detect the planned effect. Meropenem treatment did not select for colonization with CRGNOs. We suggest that meropenem as broad-spectrum antibiotic should be reserved for neonates who are more likely to have Gram-negative LOS, especially in NICUs where microorganisms producing extended spectrum- and AmpC type beta-lactamases are circulating.