Login / Signup

A longitudinal multiethnic study of biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus: Launching the GLADEL 2.0 Study Group.

José A Gómez-PuertaGuillermo J Pons-EstelRosana Maris QuintanaRomina NietoRosa M Serrano MoralesGuillermina B HarveyDaniel WojdylaMarina ScolnikCarmen Funes SoajePaula Alba MoreyraElisa NovattiFernando ArizpeGuillermo A BerbottoLuciana Gonzalez LuceroSabrina PortaNicolás PérezAnabella M RodriguezSimone AppenzellerAna Carolina de Oliveira E Silva MontadonOdirlei Andre MonticieloFernando S CavalcantiFrancinne Machado RibeiroEduardo F BorbaEdgard Torres Dos Reis-NetoOscar NeiraJosé Miguel ChahuánMilena MimicaGustavo Aroca MartínezGabriel J TobónGloria VásquezGerardo Quintana-LopezMario J Moreno AlvarezMiguel Ángel SaavedraMario Pérez CristobalHilda Fragoso-LoyoLuis M Amezcua GuerraYelitza C González-BelloCarlos Abud MendozaJorge A Esquivel-ValerioMargarita DuarteIsabel Acosta ColmanClaudia Mora-TrujilloCristina Reatégui-SokolovaArmando A Calvo QuirozRoberto Muñoz-LouisErnesto CairoliIliana RosasMartín RebellaMario H CardielIgnacio García-De La TorreLuis J CatoggioGraciela S AlarconBernardo A Pons-Estel
Published in: Lupus (2021)
Introduction: After more than 20 years of sustained work, the Latin American Group for the Study of Lupus (GLADEL) has made a significant number of contributions to the field of lupus, not only in the differential role that race/ethnicity plays in its course and outcome but also in several other studies including the beneficial effects of using antimalarials in lupus patients and the development of consensus guidelines for the treatment of lupus in our region. Methods: A new generation of "Lupus Investigators" in more than 40 centers throughout Latin America has been constituted in order to continue the legacy of the investigators of the original cohort and to launch a novel study of serum and urinary biomarkers in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Results: So far, we have recruited 807 patients and 631 controls from 42 Latin-American centers including 339 patients with SLE without renal involvement, 202 patients with SLE with prevalent but inactive renal disease, 176 patients with prevalent and active renal disease and 90 patients with incident lupus nephritis. Conclusions: The different methodological aspects of the GLADEL 2.0 cohort are discussed in this manuscript, including the challenges and difficulties of conducting such an ambitious project.
Keyphrases
  • systemic lupus erythematosus
  • disease activity
  • end stage renal disease
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • ejection fraction
  • cardiovascular disease
  • peritoneal dialysis
  • prognostic factors
  • case control