Login / Signup

Pluripotency of a founding field: rebranding developmental biology.

Crystal D RogersChris AmemiyaSwathi ArurLeslie BabonisMichael BarresiMadelaine BartlettRichard BehringerBlair Benham-PyleDominique BergmannBen BlackmanC Titus BrownBill BrowneJasmin CamachoChiswili Yves ChabuIda ChowOndine CleaverJonah CoolMegan Y DennisAlexandra Jazz DickinsonStefano Di TaliaMargaret FrankStewart GillmorEric S HaagIswar HariharanRichard HarlandAman HusbandsLoydie Jerome-MajewskaKristen KoenigCarole LabonneMichael LaydenChris LoweMadhav ManiMegan MartikKatelyn McKownCecilia MoensChristian MosimannJoyce OnyenedumRobert ReedAjna RiveraDan RokhsarLoic RoyerFlora RutaganiraRachel ShahanNeelima SinhaBillie SwallaJaimie M Van NormanDaniel E WagnerAthula WikramanayakeSophia ZebellSiobhán M Brady
Published in: Development (Cambridge, England) (2024)
The field of developmental biology has declined in prominence in recent decades, with off-shoots from the field becoming more fashionable and highly funded. This has created inequity in discovery and opportunity, partly due to the perception that the field is antiquated or not cutting edge. A 'think tank' of scientists from multiple developmental biology-related disciplines came together to define specific challenges in the field that may have inhibited innovation, and to provide tangible solutions to some of the issues facing developmental biology. The community suggestions include a call to the community to help 'rebrand' the field, alongside proposals for additional funding apparatuses, frameworks for interdisciplinary innovative collaborations, pedagogical access, improved science communication, increased diversity and inclusion, and equity of resources to provide maximal impact to the community.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • public health
  • heart rate
  • resistance training