Login / Signup

Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium.

Chandra Prakash GyawaliDaniel SifrimDustin A CarlsonMary HawnDavid A KatzkaJohn E PandolfinoRoberto PenaginiSabine RomanEdoardo SavarinoRoger TatumMichel VaeziJohn O ClarkeGeorge Triadafilopoulos
Published in: Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society (2019)
A 1-day symposium of esophageal experts reviewed existing literature on IEM, and this review represents the conclusions from the symposium. Severe IEM (>70% ineffective sequences) is associated with higher esophageal reflux burden, particularly while supine, but milder variants do not progress over time or consistently impact quality of life. Ineffective esophageal motility can be further characterized using provocative maneuvers during HRM, especially multiple rapid swallows, where augmentation of smooth muscle contraction defines contraction reserve. The presence of contraction reserve may predict better prognosis, lesser reflux burden and confidence in a standard fundoplication for surgical management of reflux. Other provocative maneuvers (solid swallows, standardized test meal, rapid drink challenge) are useful to characterize bolus transit in IEM. No effective pharmacotherapy exists, and current managements target symptoms and concurrent reflux. Novel testing modalities (baseline and mucosal impedance, functional lumen imaging probe) show promise in elucidating pathophysiology and stratifying IEM phenotypes. Specific prokinetic agents targeting esophageal smooth muscle need to be developed for precision management.
Keyphrases