Login / Signup

High-resolution silicon photomultiplier time-of-flight dedicated head PET system for clinical brain studies.

Kazunari IshiiKohei HanaokaShota WatanabeDaisuke MorimotoTakahiro YamadaHayato KaidaYoshiyuki YamakawaSuzuka MinagawaShiho TakenouchiAtsushi OhtaniTetsuro Mizuta
Published in: Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine (2022)
We acquired brain positron emission tomography (PET) images of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and flutemetamol PET using a time-of-flight-PET system dedicated for the head (dhPET) and a conventional whole-body PET/computed tomography (wbPET) system and evaluated the clinical superiority of dhPET over wbPET. Methods: There were 18 subjects for the FDG-PET study and 17 subjects for the flutemetamol PET study. FDG-PET images were first obtained using wbPET, followed by dhPET. Flutemetamol PET images were first obtained using wbPET, followed by dhPET. Images acquired using dhPET and wbPET were compared by visual inspection, voxel-wise analysis, and standard uptake value ratio (SUVR). Results: All FDG and flutemetamol images acquired using dhPET were judged as better by visual inspection than those acquired using wbPET. The voxel-wise analysis demonstrated that accumulations in the cerebellum, lateral occipital cortices, and around the central sulcus area in dhPET FDG images were lower than those in wbPET FDG images, whereas accumulations around the ventricle systems were higher in dhPET FDG images than those in wbPET FDG images. Accumulations in the cerebellar dentate nucleus, midbrain, lateral occipital cortices, and around the central sulcus area in dhPET images were lower than those in wbPET images, whereas accumulations around the ventricle systems were higher in dhPET flutemetamol images than those in wbPET flutemetamol images. Mean cortical SUVRs of FDG and flutemetamol dhPET images were significantly higher than those of FDG and flutemetamol wbPET images, respectively. Conclusion: The dhPET images had better image quality by visual inspection and higher SUVRs than wbPET images. Although there were several regional accumulation differences between dhPET and wbPET images, understanding this phenomenon will enable full use of the features of this dhPET system in clinical practice.
Keyphrases