'Fit for surgery': the relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and postoperative outcomes.
George A RoseRichard G DaviesIan R AppaduraiIan M WilliamsMohamad BashirRonan Martin Griffin BergDavid C PooleJacqueline K LimbergPublished in: Experimental physiology (2022)
deficit, the magnitude and duration of which dictates organ failure and ultimately death. CRF is by far the greatest modifiable risk factor, and optimal exercise interventions are currently under investigation in patient prehabilitation programmes. However, current practice demonstrates potential for up to 60% of patients, who undergo preoperative CPET, to have their fitness incorrectly stratified. To optimise this work we must improve the detection of CRF and reduce potential for interpretive error that may misinform risk classification and subsequent patient care, better quantify risk by expressing the power of CRF to predict mortality and morbidity compared to traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and improve patient interventions with the capacity to further enhance vascular adaptation. Thus, a better understanding of CRF, used to determine fitness for surgery, will enable both clinicians and exercise physiologists to further refine patient care and management to improve survival.
Keyphrases
- physical activity
- cardiovascular risk factors
- minimally invasive
- coronary artery bypass
- risk factors
- case report
- body composition
- patients undergoing
- high intensity
- healthcare
- machine learning
- primary care
- metabolic syndrome
- surgical site infection
- cardiovascular disease
- resistance training
- palliative care
- cardiovascular events
- coronary artery disease
- adipose tissue
- free survival
- quantum dots
- insulin resistance
- climate change
- real time pcr