Validity and reliability of the Mobile Toolbox Faces and Names memory test.
Dorene M RentzJerry SlotkinAaron J KaatStephanie Ruth YoungElizabeth M DworakYusuke ShonoHubert AdamCindy J NowinskiSarah PilaMiriam A NovackZahra HosseinianSaki AmagaiMaria Varela DiazAnyelo Almonte-CorreaKeith AlperinMonica R CamachoBernard LandavazoRachel L NoshenyMichael W WeinerRichard C GershonPublished in: Journal of neuropsychology (2024)
Validation of the Mobile Toolbox Faces and Names associative memory test is presented. Ninety-two participants self-administered Faces and Names in-person; 956 self-administered Faces and Names remotely but took convergent measures in person; and 123 self-administered Faces and Names remotely twice, 14 days apart. Internal consistency (.76-.79) and test-retest reliability (ICC = .73) were acceptable. Convergent validity with WMS-IV Verbal Paired Associates was satisfactory (immediate .54; delayed .58). The findings suggest the remotely administered Faces and Names is a reliable instrument.
Keyphrases