Development and Multicenter Validation of a Novel Immune-Inflammation-Based Nomogram to Predict Survival in Western Resectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma (GEA): The NOMOGAST.
Massimiliano SalatiNicola De RuvoMariano Cesare GiglioLorena SorrentinoGiuseppe EspositoSara FenocchiGiovanni CucciarrèFrancesco SerraElena Giulia RossiGiovanni VittimbergaGiorgia RadiLeonardo SolainiPaolo MorgagniGiulia GrizziMargherita RattiFabio GelsominoAndrea SpallanzaniMichele GhidiniGiorgio ErcolaniMassimo DominiciRoberta GelminiPublished in: Journal of clinical medicine (2022)
Background . More than 50% of operable GEA relapse after curative-intent resection. We aimed at externally validating a nomogram to enable a more accurate estimate of individualized risk in resected GEA. Methods . Medical records of a training cohort (TC) and a validation cohort (VC) of patients undergoing radical surgery for c/uT2-T4 and/or node-positive GEA were retrieved, and potentially interesting variables were collected. Cox proportional hazards in univariate and multivariate regressions were used to assess the effects of the prognostic factors on OS. A graphical nomogram was constructed using R software's package Regression Modeling Strategies (ver. 5.0-1). The performance of the prognostic model was evaluated and validated. Results . The TC and VC consisted of 185 and 151 patients. ECOG:PS > 0 ( p < 0.001), angioinvasion ( p < 0.001), log (Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio) ( p < 0.001), and nodal status ( p = 0.016) were independent prognostic values in the TC. They were used for the construction of a nomogram estimating 3- and 5-year OS. The discriminatory ability of the model was evaluated with the c-Harrell index. A 3-tier scoring system was developed through a linear predictor grouped by 25 and 75 percentiles, strengthening the model's good discrimination ( p < 0.001). A calibration plot demonstrated a concordance between the predicted and actual survival in the TC and VC. A decision curve analysis was plotted that depicted the nomogram's clinical utility. Conclusions . We externally validated a prognostic nomogram to predict OS in a joint independent cohort of resectable GEA; the NOMOGAST could represent a valuable tool in assisting decision-making. This tool incorporates readily available and inexpensive patient and disease characteristics as well as immune-inflammatory determinants. It is accurate, generalizable, and clinically effectivex.
Keyphrases
- prognostic factors
- lymph node metastasis
- decision making
- patients undergoing
- lymph node
- locally advanced
- squamous cell carcinoma
- oxidative stress
- end stage renal disease
- healthcare
- minimally invasive
- free survival
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- high resolution
- data analysis
- neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- peritoneal dialysis
- wastewater treatment
- patient reported outcomes
- virtual reality
- percutaneous coronary intervention