Login / Signup

WT1 -mutated acute myeloid leukemia is sensitive to fludarabine-based chemotherapy and conditioning regimens.

Ahmed AribiAmandeep SalhotraMichelle AfkhamiAnamaria MunteanuHaris AliIbrahim AldossSalman OtoukeshMonzr M Al MalkiKaramjeet S SandhuPaul KollerShukaib ArslanForrest StewartAndrew S ArtzPeter CurtinBrian BallJames O'HearnRicardo SpielbergerEileen SmithElizabeth BuddeRyotaro NakamuraAnthony SteinStephen FormanGuido MarcucciPamela S BeckerVinod Pullarkat
Published in: Leukemia & lymphoma (2023)
We conducted a retrospective analysis of WT1- mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant. Thirty-seven patients with WT1- mutated AML were identified. Primary induction failure (40%) and early relapse rate (18%) after idarubicin/cytarabine (7 + 3) chemotherapy were observed. All patients with induction failure subsequently achieved CR with additional chemotherapy. There was no significant difference between outcomes after myeloablative vs. reduced intensity (Fludarabine/Melphalan [Flu/Mel]) conditioning regimens. RFS but not OS was significantly better in patients who received FLAG-IDA prior to transplant and/or a fludarabine-containing conditioning. In an independent ex vivo study, WT1 -mutated AML samples exhibited greater sensitivity to fludarabine ( p  = 0.026) and melphalan ( p  = 0.0005) than non- WT1- mutated AML samples while there was no difference between sensitivity to cytarabine. Our data favor using a fludarabine-based induction for AML with WT1 mutation instead of 7 + 3. Fludarabine conditioning regimens for alloHCT showed better RFS but not OS.
Keyphrases