Clinical Utility of Pharmacogene Panel-Based Testing in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Nihal El RoubyAdel AlrwisanTaimour LangaeeGloria LiporiDominick J AngiolilloFrancesco FranchiAlberto RivaAmanda ElseyJulie A JohnsonLarisa H CavallariAlmut G WintersteinPublished in: Clinical and translational science (2020)
We aimed to estimate the utility of panel-based pharmacogenetic testing of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Utilization of Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium (CPIC) level A/B drugs after PCI was estimated in a national sample of IBM MarketScan beneficiaries. Genotype data from University of Florida (UF) patients (n = 211) who underwent PCI were used to project genotype-guided opportunities among MarketScan beneficiaries with at least one (N = 105,547) and five (N = 12,462) years of follow-up data. The actual incidence of genotype-guided prescribing opportunities was determined among UF patients. In MarketScan, 50.0% (52,799/105,547) over 1 year and 68.0% (8,473/12,462) over 5 years had ≥ 1 CPIC A/B drug besides antiplatelet therapy prescribed, with a projected incidence of genotype-guided prescribing opportunities of 39% at 1 year and 52% at 5 years. Genotype-guided prescribing opportunities occurred in 32% of UF patients. Projected and actual incidence of genotype-guided opportunities among two cohorts supports the utility of panel-based testing among patients who underwent PCI.
Keyphrases
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- antiplatelet therapy
- acute coronary syndrome
- coronary artery disease
- acute myocardial infarction
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- patients undergoing
- end stage renal disease
- primary care
- ejection fraction
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- newly diagnosed
- atrial fibrillation
- prognostic factors
- healthcare
- quality improvement
- machine learning
- left ventricular
- electronic health record
- patient reported
- coronary artery bypass