Methods of RNA preparation affect mRNA abundance quantification of reference genes in pig maturing oocytes.
Y-K WangX LiZ-Q SongCai-Xia YangPublished in: Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene (2017)
To ensure accurate normalization and quantification of target RNA transcripts using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), most studies focus on the identification of stably expressed gene(s) as internal reference. However, RNA preparation methods could also be an important factor, especially for test samples of limited quantity (e.g. oocytes). In this study, we aimed to select appropriate reference gene(s), and evaluate the effect of RNA preparation methods on gene expression quantification in porcine oocytes and cumulus cells during in vitro maturation. Expression profiles of seven genes (GAPDH, 18S, YWHAG, BACT, RPL4, HPRT1 and PPIA) were examined, on RNA samples extracted from cumulus cells (RNeasy Kit) and oocytes (RNeasy Kit and Lysis Kit) during in vitro maturation, respectively. Interestingly, different RNA preparation methods were found to potentially affect the quantification of reference gene expression in pig oocytes cultured in vitro. After geNorm analyses, the most suitable genes for normalization were identified, GAPDH/18S for cumulus cells and YWHAG/BACT for oocytes, respectively. Thus, our results provide useful data and information on the selection of better reference genes and RNA preparation method for related functional studies.
Keyphrases
- gene expression
- genome wide
- induced apoptosis
- genome wide identification
- cell cycle arrest
- dna methylation
- nucleic acid
- molecularly imprinted
- copy number
- machine learning
- transcription factor
- genome wide analysis
- high resolution
- endoplasmic reticulum stress
- cell proliferation
- endothelial cells
- deep learning
- social media
- electronic health record
- wastewater treatment
- case control
- solid phase extraction