Login / Signup

Deep Learning Classification of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia Predicts Outcomes.

Stephen M HumphriesDevlin ThiekeDavid BaraghoshiMatthew J StrandJeffrey J SwigrisKum Ju ChaeHye Jeon HwangAndrea S OhKevin R FlahertyAyodeji AdegunsoyeRenea JablonskiCathryn T LeeAliya N HusainJonathan H ChungMary E StrekDavid A Lynch
Published in: American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2024)
Rationale: Computed tomography (CT) enables noninvasive diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), but enhanced image analyses are needed to overcome the limitations of visual assessment. Objectives: Apply multiple instance learning (MIL) to develop an explainable deep learning algorithm for prediction of UIP from CT and validate its performance in independent cohorts. Methods: We trained an MIL algorithm using a pooled dataset ( n  = 2,143) and tested it in three independent populations: data from a prior publication ( n  = 127), a single-institution clinical cohort ( n  = 239), and a national registry of patients with pulmonary fibrosis ( n  = 979). We tested UIP classification performance using receiver operating characteristic analysis, with histologic UIP as ground truth. Cox proportional hazards and linear mixed-effects models were used to examine associations between MIL predictions and survival or longitudinal FVC. Measurements and Main Results: In two cohorts with biopsy data, MIL improved accuracy for histologic UIP (area under the curve, 0.77 [ n  = 127] and 0.79 [ n  = 239]) compared with visual assessment (area under the curve, 0.65 and 0.71). In cohorts with survival data, MIL-UIP classifications were significant for mortality ( n  = 239, mortality to April 2021: unadjusted hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96-4.91; P  < 0.001; and n  = 979, mortality to July 2022: unadjusted hazard ratio, 3.64; 95% CI, 2.66-4.97; P  < 0.001). Individuals classified as UIP positive by the algorithm had a significantly greater annual decline in FVC than those classified as UIP negative (-88 ml/yr vs. -45 ml/yr; n  = 979; P  < 0.01), adjusting for extent of lung fibrosis. Conclusions: Computerized assessment using MIL identifies clinically significant features of UIP on CT. Such a method could improve confidence in radiologic assessment of patients with interstitial lung disease, potentially enabling earlier and more precise diagnosis.
Keyphrases