Login / Signup

Layer-specific strain in patients with heart failure using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: not all layers are the same.

Lingyu XuJoseph J PaganoMark J HaykowksyJustin A EzekowitzGavin Y OuditYoko MikamiAndrew HowarthJames A WhiteJason R B DyckTodd AndersonD Ian PatersonRichard B Thompsonnull null
Published in: Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (2020)
Global strains measured on endocardium, epicardium or averaged across the wall thickness are not equivalent for the identification of systolic dysfunction or outcomes prediction in HF. The endocardium-specific strains were shown to have poorest all-around performance. GLS_AVE and GRS were the only CMR parameters to be significantly associated with 5-year all-cause mortality in multivariable analysis. GLS_EPI and GRS, as well as the difference in endocardial and epicardial strains, were sensitive to systolic dysfunction among HF patients with normal LVEF (>ā€‰55%), in whom lower strains were associated with increased concentricity.
Keyphrases
  • escherichia coli
  • magnetic resonance
  • blood pressure
  • heart failure
  • oxidative stress
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • computed tomography
  • acute heart failure
  • contrast enhanced