Decompressive Craniectomy versus Craniotomy for Acute Subdural Hematoma.
Peter J HutchinsonHadie AdamsMidhun MohanBhagavatula I DeviChristopher UffShumaila HasanHarry MeeMark H WilsonDeepak Kumar GuptaDiederik BultersArdalan ZolnourianCatherine J McMahonMatthew G StovellYahia Z Al-TamimiManoj K TewariManjul TripathiSimon ThomsonEdoardo ViaroliAntonio BelliAndrew T KingAdel E HelmyIvan S TimofeevSarah PyneDhaval P ShuklaDhananjaya I BhatAndrew R MaasFranco ServadeiGeoffrey T ManleyGarry BartonCarole TurnerDavid K MenonBarbara GregsonAngelos G Koliasnull nullPublished in: The New England journal of medicine (2023)
Among patients with traumatic acute subdural hematoma who underwent craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy, disability and quality-of-life outcomes were similar with the two approaches. Additional surgery was performed in a higher proportion of the craniotomy group, but more wound complications occurred in the craniectomy group. (Funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research; RESCUE-ASDH ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN87370545.).
Keyphrases
- severe traumatic brain injury
- traumatic brain injury
- liver failure
- healthcare
- respiratory failure
- quality improvement
- public health
- minimally invasive
- multiple sclerosis
- spinal cord injury
- aortic dissection
- drug induced
- palliative care
- surgical site infection
- mental health
- coronary artery bypass
- health information
- coronary artery disease
- pain management
- health promotion
- intensive care unit
- climate change
- skeletal muscle
- adipose tissue
- chronic pain
- glycemic control