Login / Signup

Therapeutic Modulation of Dupilumab in Patients with Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Clinical Effectiveness in Real Life.

Luca MastorinoRichard BorrelliNicole MacagnoFederica GelatoErica BaimaIrene RichiardiGiovanni CavalierePietro QuaglinoMichela OrtoncelliSimone Ribero
Published in: Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug (2024)
Background: De-escalation strategies have become increasingly used in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) patients with dupilumab. Dose spacing (DS) refers to dose reduction by dosage elongation strategies from 2 to 8 weeks between dupilumab injections, in patients with stable response to treatment or affected by numerous adverse events. Objectives: Investigate safety and clinical effectiveness of DS strategy in AD patients treated with dupilumab. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on AD patients aged ≥18 years treated with dupilumab undergoing DS. Pre-post analyses were conducted on this cohort, termed cohort A, between effectiveness outcomes at baseline, at 16 weeks of treatment, at the index date identified as the mean follow-up time between dupilumab initiation and DS, and at subsequent two follow-up visits: T1 and T2. Based on the index date, a cohort B of AD patients on dupilumab treatment not experiencing DS was then compared with cohort A for the same outcomes at the same time points. Results: Seventy-three out of 452 patients treated with dupilumab underwent DS. The mean time since treatment initiation was 28.6 months. Mean Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) from the index date remained stable until the second follow-up visit (T2) 0.2-0.8 with no significant pre-post differences ( P > 0.05). Similar considerations can be made for mean number rating scale worst pruritus (NRSp), numerical rating scale disturbs of sleeping/sleeping disturb (NRSsd), mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and EASI Head and Neck. Attainment of relative outcomes remained stable for EASI75, 90, ≤ 7, DLQI ≤ 5, and NRSp ≤ 4. When compared with cohort B, no clinically significant differences were observed in mean reductions in all outcomes analyzed. Conclusions: DS in our study appears to be an effective and safe strategy in treating patients with severe AD after the initial therapeutic response.
Keyphrases
  • atopic dermatitis
  • end stage renal disease
  • clinical trial
  • metabolic syndrome
  • peritoneal dialysis
  • replacement therapy
  • insulin resistance
  • drug induced
  • quality improvement
  • psychometric properties
  • patient reported