Individualized Surgeon Reports in a Statewide Registry.
J Wesley MeskoHuiyong ZhengRichard E HughesBrian R HallstromPublished in: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume (2024)
Despite progress with the development of joint replacement registries in the United States, surgeons may have limited opportunities to determine the cumulative outcome of their own patients or understand how those outcomes compare with their peers; this information is important for quality improvement. In order to provide surgeons with accurate data, it is first necessary to have a registry with complete coverage and patient matching. Some international registries have accomplished this. Building on a comprehensive statewide registry in the United States, a surgeon-specific report has been developed to provide surgeons with survivorship and complication data, which allows comparisons with other surgeons in the state. This article describes funnel plots, cumulative sum reports, complication-specific data, and patient-reported outcome measure data, which are provided to hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons with the goal of improving quality, decreasing variability in the delivery of care, and leading to improved value and outcomes for hip and knee arthroplasty in the state of Michigan.
Keyphrases
- quality improvement
- patient safety
- electronic health record
- patient reported outcomes
- big data
- thoracic surgery
- end stage renal disease
- chronic kidney disease
- healthcare
- newly diagnosed
- type diabetes
- high resolution
- data analysis
- robot assisted
- adipose tissue
- weight loss
- artificial intelligence
- minimally invasive
- young adults
- deep learning
- pain management
- glycemic control
- social media