Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI.
Ziad A AliUlf LandmesserAkiko MaeharaMitsuaki MatsumuraRichard A ShlofmitzGiulio GuagliumiMatthew J PriceJonathan M HillTakashi AkasakaFrancesco PratiHiram G BezerraWilliam WijnsDavid LeistnerPaolo CanovaFernando AlfonsoFranco FabbiocchiOzgen DoganRobert J McGreevyRobert W McNuttHong NieJana BuccolaNick E J WestGregg W Stonenull nullPublished in: The New England journal of medicine (2023)
Among patients undergoing PCI, OCT guidance resulted in a larger minimum stent area than angiography guidance, but there was no apparent between-group difference in the percentage of patients with target-vessel failure at 2 years. (Funded by Abbott; ILUMIEN IV: OPTIMAL PCI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03507777.).
Keyphrases
- optical coherence tomography
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- coronary artery disease
- acute myocardial infarction
- acute coronary syndrome
- antiplatelet therapy
- patients undergoing
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- diabetic retinopathy
- atrial fibrillation
- optic nerve
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- computed tomography
- heart failure
- left ventricular
- magnetic resonance
- coronary artery bypass