Experiences of patients and health care professionals on the quality of telephone follow-up care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a large qualitative study in a multidisciplinary academic setting.
Famke M van ErkelMyrthe J PetElles Hm BossinkCathy F M van de GraafMarije T J HodesSonja N van OgtropMarian J E MouritsGera A WelkerGyorgy B HalmosBarbara van LeeuwenEmoke RaczAnna K L ReynersBarbara C van MunsterHester J van der Zaag-LoonenPublished in: BMJ open (2022)
This study concludes that TCs seem a valuable contribution to the context of follow-up care and could partially replace face-to-face consultations. TCs can be performed in stable, chronic patients with whom a doctor-patient relationship has already been established. Face-to-face consultations are considered more appropriate in the case of new patients, challenging or emotionally charged consultations and when clinically relevant physical examination is indicated. Due to the context-dependent nature of experiences of patients and HCPs, TCs should be used with an individually customised approach based on patient and disease specifics, in which shared decision-making plays an extensive role. Before major implementation is considered, sufficient data on the safety regarding missed diagnoses or cancer recurrences should be assembled first.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- mental health
- peritoneal dialysis
- primary care
- quality improvement
- prognostic factors
- palliative care
- squamous cell carcinoma
- case report
- patient reported outcomes
- deep learning
- artificial intelligence
- young adults
- papillary thyroid