Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: The network meta-analysis.
Takuya OgamiYujiro YokoyamaHisato TakagiDerek Serna-GallegosFrancis D FerdinandIbrahim S SultanToshiki KunoPublished in: Journal of cardiac surgery (2022)
While mid-term mortality was comparable among approaches, MS may be a safe and potentially more effective approach than FS and RMT for SAVR in the short term.
Keyphrases
- aortic valve replacement
- minimally invasive
- systematic review
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- aortic valve
- aortic stenosis
- meta analyses
- mass spectrometry
- multiple sclerosis
- cardiovascular events
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- ms ms
- ejection fraction
- case control
- type diabetes
- heart failure
- coronary artery disease
- network analysis