Conceptual and empirical bridges between micro- and macroevolution.
Jonathan RollandL Francisco Henao-DiazMichael DoebeliRachel M GermainLuke J HarmonL Lacey Knowles KnowlesLee Hsiang LiowJudith E MankAntonin MachacSarah Perin OttoMatt PennellNicolas SalaminDaniele SilvestroMauro SugawaraJosef UyedaCatherine E WagnerDolph SchluterPublished in: Nature ecology & evolution (2023)
Explaining broad molecular, phenotypic and species biodiversity patterns necessitates a unifying framework spanning multiple evolutionary scales. Here we argue that although substantial effort has been made to reconcile microevolution and macroevolution, much work remains to identify the links between biological processes at play. We highlight four major questions of evolutionary biology whose solutions require conceptual bridges between micro and macroevolution. We review potential avenues for future research to establish how mechanisms at one scale (drift, mutation, migration, selection) translate to processes at the other scale (speciation, extinction, biogeographic dispersal) and vice versa. We propose ways in which current comparative methods to infer molecular evolution, phenotypic evolution and species diversification could be improved to specifically address these questions. We conclude that researchers are in a better position than ever before to build a synthesis to understand how microevolutionary dynamics unfold over millions of years.