Cell administration routes for heart failure: a comparative re-evaluation of the REGENERATE-DCM and REGENERATE-IHD trials.
Doo Sun SimDaniel A JonesCeri DaviesDidier LoccaJessry VeerapenAlice ReidThomas GodecJohn MartinAnthony MathurPublished in: Regenerative medicine (2022)
Aims: Given the logistical issues surrounding intramyocardial cell delivery, we sought to address the efficacy of the simpler, more accessible intracoronary route by re-evaluating REGENERATE-DCM and REGENERATE-IHD (autologous cell therapy trials for heart failure; n = 150). Methods: A retrospective statistical analysis was performed on the trials' combined data. The following end points were evaluated: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide concentration (NT-proBNP), New York Heart Association class (NYHA) and quality of life. Results: This demonstrated a new efficacy signal for intracoronary delivery, with significant benefits to: LVEF (3.7%; p = 0.01), NT-proBNP (median -76 pg/ml; p = 0.04), NYHA class (48% patients; p = 0.01) and quality of life (12 ± 19; p = 0.006). The improvements in LVEF, NYHA and quality of life scores remained significant compared to the control group. Conclusion: The efficacy and logistical simplicity of intracoronary delivery should be taken into consideration for future trials.
Keyphrases
- cell therapy
- ejection fraction
- heart failure
- aortic stenosis
- left ventricular
- stem cells
- mesenchymal stem cells
- end stage renal disease
- cardiac resynchronization therapy
- single cell
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- atrial fibrillation
- prognostic factors
- chronic kidney disease
- acute myocardial infarction
- peritoneal dialysis
- coronary artery disease
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- bone marrow
- resting state
- data analysis
- functional connectivity