Login / Signup

The Significance of Histopathological Findings on Clinical Outcomes in Endoscopic Papillectomy with Endocut.

Sayaka MiyamotoMasahiro SerikawaYasutaka IshiiYumiko TatsukawaShinya NakamuraJuri IkemotoYosuke TamuraKazuki NakamuraMasaru FurukawaYumiko YamashitaNoriaki IijimaKoji ArihiroShiro Oka
Published in: Journal of clinical medicine (2023)
This study aimed to evaluate primary clinical outcomes in patients who underwent endoscopic papillectomy (EP) using the Endocut mode while examining the pathological characteristics of the margin of the resected specimen. To this end, 70 patients who underwent Endocut EP were included. Resection margins were classified according to pathological findings as "negative", "positive", or "uncertain (difficult pathological evaluation)". The effect of pathological resection margins on residual tumor recurrence rates was evaluated. The median follow-up was 47 months (range, 22-84). Eleven patients (15.7%) were diagnosed with residual tumors, ten of whom were diagnosed within 6 months after EP. The resection margins were pathologically negative in 27 patients, positive in 15, and uncertain in 28; residual tumors occurred in 5 patients (33.3%) in the positive group, 5 (17.9%) in the uncertain group, and 1 (3.7%) in the negative group. The patient in the negative group had familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Female sex, FAP, and uncertain or positive resection margins were significantly more common in residual patients ( p = 0.009, 0.044, and 0.041, respectively). Pathological resection margins can be used to infer the residual tumor incidence, leading to early post-treatment of residual tumors.
Keyphrases
  • end stage renal disease
  • ejection fraction
  • newly diagnosed
  • chronic kidney disease
  • prognostic factors
  • peritoneal dialysis