Login / Signup

Performance comparison of a previously validated microhaplotype panel and a forensic STR panel for DNA mixture analysis.

J González-BaoA Mosquera-MiguelL Casanova-AdánA Ambroa-CondeJ Ruiz-RamírezA Cabrejas-OlallaM Boullón-CassauA Freire-AradasA Rodríguez-LópezC RothR LagacéC PhillipsM V LareuM de la Puente
Published in: Forensic science international. Genetics (2024)
Short Tandem Repeats (STRs) are the most widespread markers in forensic genetics. However, STR stutter peaks can mask alleles from a minor contributor when analysing mixtures, hindering the interpretation of complex profiles. In this study we compared the performance of a previously described panel of microhaplotypes (MHs), an alternative type of forensic marker, against a standard STR kit. The parameters evaluated included: capability of determining the minimum number of contributors in the mixture; percentages of allele drop-outs and drop-ins; retrieval of alleles belonging to the minor contributor, and estimation of likelihood ratio (LR) values. In addition, the capacity of EuroForMix software to estimate each donor's percentage of contribution was tested, as well as the impact on results when using manually, or automatically prepared libraries. The MH panel showed better performance than STRs for the detection of 2-contributor mixtures, but the lower degree of polymorphism per MH marker hindered the task of deconvolution with multiple contributors. MHs presented higher drop-in rates and lower drop-out rates, a higher capability to recover the minor contributor's alleles and provided higher LR values than STRs, likely due to the much higher number of loci combined in the panel. Estimations of contributor ratios using EuroForMix showed promising results and marginal differences were found in these values between manually and automatically prepared libraries. Overall, results showed that the mixture detection performance of the MH panel was better or equal to the standard forensic autosomal STR panel, indicating microhaplotypes are informative markers for this purpose.
Keyphrases
  • ionic liquid
  • dna methylation
  • data analysis
  • clinical evaluation