[Open Fractures of the Hand: is there No Alternative to Definitive Osteosynthetic Treatment in an Emergency Situation?]
Daniel VergoteMartin MentzelSimon BauknechtRichard-Tobias MoellerPublished in: Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V... (2024)
There is an emergency indication for the treatment of open fractures. Fracture stabilisation and soft tissue care are equal prerequisites for an uncomplicated course of treatment and a good functional result. However, challenges arise in cases of extensive wound contamination and compromised perfusion, limiting options for stable osteosynthesis in emergency situations. Furthermore, resource constraints may pose a challenge to adhering strictly to the six-hour time window. This prompts deliberations on whether, under certain circumstances, a deviation from the conventional approach is feasible by exploring the possibility of prioritising immediate surgical wound care during emergencies, with definitive fracture care deferred to a later point in time. Between 2019 and 2021, 301 patients with open fractures of the hand skeleton were treated (median age 44 years, 85% male, 15% female). Definitive treatment was carried out as a primary emergency procedure in 215 patients (group A), whereas it was performed at an interval after an average of 3 days in 86 patients (group B), who had received surgical wound care, splint placement, and antibiotic coverage on the day of the injury. In a retrospective study, the following criteria were analysed: comorbidities, injury patterns, injury location, timing of treatment, number of follow-up procedures, infection rate, and duration of hospitalisation. The course was complicated by infection in six patients (1.9%). Five of these patients were in group A (infection rate 2.3%), and only one patient was in group B (infection rate 1.1%). All six infections occurred after crush injuries, all at the fingertip or end joint. These numbers underscore the relevance of soft tissue trauma and primary stump formation. Comorbidities were not statistically significant in our study with a view to the occurrence of infection. In conclusion, it can be stated that, with antibiotic protection, definitive treatment of an open fracture in an interval is possible if it is preceded by initial emergency surgical wound care with subsequent immobilisation.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- emergency department
- public health
- chronic kidney disease
- soft tissue
- risk assessment
- quality improvement
- minimally invasive
- blood pressure
- computed tomography
- peritoneal dialysis
- squamous cell carcinoma
- magnetic resonance
- radiation therapy
- combination therapy
- magnetic resonance imaging
- pain management
- drinking water
- heavy metals
- replacement therapy
- case report
- contrast enhanced
- locally advanced
- smoking cessation
- ultrasound guided
- health risk