Ancillary health effects of climate mitigation scenarios as drivers of policy uptake: a review of air quality, transportation and diet co-benefits modeling studies.
Kelly M ChangJeremy J HessJohn M BalbusJonathan J BuonocoreDavid A ClevelandMaggie L GrabowRoni A NeffRebecca K SaariChristopher W TessumPaul WilkinsonAlistair WoodwardKristie L EbiPublished in: Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site] (2017)
Most studies indicated significant, nearer term, local ancillary health benefits providing impetus for policy uptake and net cost savings. However, studies were more suited to describing the interaction of climate policy and health and the magnitude of potential outcomes than to providing specific accurate estimates of health co-benefits. Modeling the health co-benefits of climate policy provides policy-relevant information when the scenarios are reasonable, relevant, and thorough, and the model adequately addresses complexity. Greater consistency in selected modeling choices across the health co-benefits of climate mitigation research would facilitate evaluation of mitigation options particularly as they apply to the NDCs and promote policy uptake.