Login / Signup

Accuracy of Fitbit Charge 4, Garmin Vivosmart 4, and WHOOP Versus Polysomnography: Systematic Review.

An-Marie SchyvensNina Catharina Van OostJean-Marie AertsFederica MasciBrent PetersAn NevenHélène DirixGeert WetsVeerle RossJohan Verbraecken
Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (2024)
The findings of this systematic literature review indicate that the devices with higher relative agreement and sensitivities to multistate sleep (ie, Fitbit Charge 4 and WHOOP) seem appropriate for deriving suitable estimates of sleep parameters. However, analyses regarding the multistate categorization of sleep indicate that all devices can benefit from further improvement in the assessment of specific sleep stages. Although providers are continuously developing new versions and variants of wearables, the scientific research on these wearables remains considerably limited. This scarcity in literature not only reduces our ability to draw definitive conclusions but also highlights the need for more targeted research in this domain. Additionally, future research endeavors should strive for standardized protocols including larger sample sizes to enhance the comparability and power of the results across studies.
Keyphrases
  • systematic review
  • sleep quality
  • physical activity
  • obstructive sleep apnea
  • depressive symptoms
  • squamous cell carcinoma
  • sleep apnea
  • rectal cancer