Login / Signup

A Best Practices Case Study for Scientific Collaboration between Researchers and Managers.

Tammy J NewcombPaul W SimoninFelix A MartinezW Lindsay ChaddertonJon M BossenbroekBecky CudmoreMichael H HoffReuben P KellerBerkley D RidenhourJohn D RothlisbergerEdward S RutherfordScott Van EgerenDavid M Lodge
Published in: Fisheries (2020)
Effective engagement among scientists, government agency staff, and policymakers is necessary for solving fisheries challenges, but remains challenging for a variety of reasons. We present seven practices learned from a collaborative project focused on invasive species in the Great Lakes region (USA-CAN). These practices were based on a researcher-manager model composed of a research team, a management advisory board, and a bridging organization. We suggest this type of system functions well when (1) the management advisory board is provided compelling rationale for engagement; (2) the process uses key individuals as communicators; (3) the research team thoughtfully selects organizations and individuals involved; (4) the funding entity provides logistical support and allows for (5) a flexible structure that prioritizes management needs; (6) a bridging organization sustains communication between in-person meetings; and (7) the project team determines and enacts a project endpoint. We predict these approaches apply equally effectively to other challenges at the research-management-policy interface, including reductions of water pollution, transitions to renewable energy, increasing food security, and addressing climate change.
Keyphrases
  • quality improvement
  • healthcare
  • climate change
  • primary care
  • palliative care
  • mental health
  • social media
  • public health
  • clinical trial
  • risk assessment
  • human health
  • particulate matter