Login / Signup

Predictive modeling algorithms for liver metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of the current literature.

Isaac Seow-EnYe Xin KohYun ZhaoBoon Hwee AngIvan En-Howe TanAik Yong ChokEmile John Kwong Wei TanMarianne Kit Har Au
Published in: Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery (2023)
This study aims to assess the quality and performance of predictive models for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM). A systematic review was performed to identify relevant studies from various databases. Studies that described or validated predictive models for CRCLM were included. The methodological quality of the predictive models was assessed. Model performance was evaluated by the reported area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Of the 117 articles screened, seven studies comprising 14 predictive models were included. The distribution of included predictive models was as follows: radiomics (n = 3), logistic regression (n = 3), Cox regression (n = 2), nomogram (n = 3), support vector machine (SVM, n = 2), random forest (n = 2), and convolutional neural network (CNN, n = 2). Age, sex, carcinoembryonic antigen, and tumor staging (T and N stage) were the most frequently used clinicopathological predictors for CRCLM. The mean AUCs ranged from 0.697 to 0.870, with 86% of the models demonstrating clear discriminative ability (AUC > 0.70). A hybrid approach combining clinical and radiomic features with SVM provided the best performance, achieving an AUC of 0.870. The overall risk of bias was identified as high in 71% of the included studies. This review highlights the potential of predictive modeling to accurately predict the occurrence of CRCLM. Integrating clinicopathological and radiomic features with machine learning algorithms demonstrates superior predictive capabilities.
Keyphrases
  • machine learning
  • convolutional neural network
  • deep learning
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • case control
  • systematic review
  • risk assessment
  • lymph node
  • computed tomography
  • quality improvement
  • big data
  • human health