Mirels Scores in Patients Undergoing Prophylactic Stabilization for Femoral Metastatic Bone Disease in the Veterans Administration Healthcare System.
Duncan C RamseyPhillip W LamJames B HaydenYee-Cheen DoungKenneth R GundlePublished in: Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews (2021)
This retrospective study of prophylactically stabilized metastatic lesions revealed that more than 90% of patients had Mirels scores greater than 8, suggesting a substantial risk of pathologic fracture. Over half of all stabilized lesions were peritrochanteric and lytic. These criteria alone achieve a minimum Mirels score of 8; however, one-third of these lacked functional pain. Notably, Mirels' original paper found location and type criteria to be the least predictive of impending fracture. Contrariwise, functional pain was the most accurate predictor. Multiple studies have found poor specificity of the Mirels criteria. The high scores achievable by the location and type criteria may represent an overrepresentation of their contribution to fracture risk. Reconsideration of the relative weights of each criterion warrants further examination.
Keyphrases
- chronic pain
- patients undergoing
- end stage renal disease
- squamous cell carcinoma
- small cell lung cancer
- pain management
- neuropathic pain
- chronic kidney disease
- ejection fraction
- hip fracture
- newly diagnosed
- prognostic factors
- bone mineral density
- high resolution
- patient reported outcomes
- radiation therapy
- spinal cord injury
- spinal cord
- body composition
- postmenopausal women
- rectal cancer