Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.
Peiyin HungShi-Yi WangBrigid K KilleleaSarah S MougalianSuzanne B EvansTannaz SedghiCary P GrossPublished in: JNCI cancer spectrum (2019)
The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is controversial. Using population-cohort data, we examined whether SLNB improves long-term outcomes among patients with DCIS who underwent breast-conserving surgery. We identified 12 776 women aged 67-94 years diagnosed during 2001-2013 with DCIS who underwent breast-conserving surgery from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare dataset, 1992 (15.6%) of whom underwent SLNB (median follow-up: 69 months). Tests of statistical significance are two-sided. Patients with and without SLNB did not differ statistically significantly regarding treated recurrence (3.9% vs 3.7%; P = .62), ipsilateral invasive occurrence (1.4% vs 1.7%, P = .33), or breast cancer mortality (1.0% vs 0.9%, P = .86). With Mahalanobis-matching and competing-risks survival analyses, SLNB was not statistically significantly associated with treated recurrence, ipsilateral invasive occurrence, or breast cancer mortality (P ≥ .27). Our findings do not support the routine performance of SLNB for older patients with DCIS amenable to breast conservation.
Keyphrases
- sentinel lymph node
- neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- early stage
- lymph node
- minimally invasive
- coronary artery bypass
- risk assessment
- cardiovascular events
- free survival
- risk factors
- locally advanced
- public health
- ultrasound guided
- surgical site infection
- polycystic ovary syndrome
- fine needle aspiration
- physical activity
- healthcare
- human health
- rectal cancer
- cardiovascular disease
- squamous cell carcinoma
- radiation therapy
- big data
- newly diagnosed
- machine learning
- skeletal muscle
- pregnancy outcomes
- young adults
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- climate change