Reverse total shoulder replacement versus anatomical total shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis: population based cohort study using data from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics for England.
Epaminondas Markos ValsamisAlbert Prats-UribeIan KoblbauerSophie ColeAdrian SayersMichael Richard WhitehouseGillian CowardGary Stephen CollinsRafael Pinedo-VillanuevaDaniel Prieto AlhambraJonathan L ReesPublished in: BMJ (Clinical research ed.) (2024)
This study's findings provide reassurance that RTSR is an acceptable alternative to TSR for patients aged 60 years or older with osteoarthritis and intact rotator cuff tendons. Despite a significant difference in the risk profiles of revision surgery over time, no statistically significant and clinically important differences between RTSR and TSR were found in terms of long term revision surgery, serious adverse events, reoperations, prolonged hospital stay, or lifetime healthcare costs.
Keyphrases
- rotator cuff
- healthcare
- minimally invasive
- total knee arthroplasty
- coronary artery bypass
- end stage renal disease
- rheumatoid arthritis
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- total hip arthroplasty
- knee osteoarthritis
- adverse drug
- surgical site infection
- prognostic factors
- acute care
- electronic health record
- quality improvement
- patient reported outcomes
- emergency department
- machine learning
- coronary artery disease
- big data
- middle aged
- atrial fibrillation