Login / Signup

Comparison of Titanium and Bioresorbable Plates in "A" Shape Plate Properties-Finite Element Analysis.

Rafał ZielińskiMarcin KozakiewiczJacek Świniarski
Published in: Materials (Basel, Switzerland) (2019)
(1) Background: The main disadvantage of rigid fracture fixation is remain material after healing period. Implementation of resorbable plates prevents issues resulting from left plates. The aim of this study is to compare the usage of bioresorbable and titanium "A" shape condyle plate in condylar fractures. (2) Methods: Thickness of 1.0 mm, height of 31 mm, and width of 19 mm polylactic acid (PLLA) and titanium "A" shape plate with 2.0 mm-wide connecting bar and 9 holes were tested with finite element analysis in high right condylar neck fracture. (3) Results: On bone surface the highest stress is on the anterior bridge around first hole (approx. 100 MPa). The highest stress on screws is located in the first screw around plate in the anterior bridge and is greater in titanium (150 MPa) than PLLA (114 MPa). (4) Conclusion: Pressure on bone in PLLA osteosynthesis is two times higher than in titanium fixation. On small areas where pressure on bone is too high it causes local bone degradation around the fracture and may delay the healing process or make it impossible. Fixation by PLLA is such flexible that bone edges slide and twist what may lead to degradation of callus.
Keyphrases
  • bone mineral density
  • finite element analysis
  • soft tissue
  • bone loss
  • minimally invasive
  • bone regeneration
  • postmenopausal women
  • primary care
  • epithelial mesenchymal transition
  • signaling pathway