It is very difficult to find certain surgical field in which surgeon's decision is absolutely evidence-based. The objective of evidence-based medicine (and surgery) is offering the best treatment for each patient that should encourage conducting the randomized trials (RT) as the highest level of evidence. The results of RTs often contradict the existing clinical experience, and experience per se does not always confirm the significance of the results obtained. One cannot make any conclusions based on RT data. Treatment strategy for a particular patient remains unclear. The authors have analyzed the results of large-scale RTs devoted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, rectal surgery, lung cancer surgery, postoperative care, treatment of pulmonary emphysema. It was shown that RT data as the highest level of evidence are not always true for surgery. In most clinical situations, the decision is not based on RT results. The desire of surgeons to master a new technique is often more significant than patient care, while clinical experience and the laws of the market are more important than science. There is no doubt that knowledge of RT results are essential in training period, but this means quite a bit for a particular patient. The best decision can be made during discussion and conversation with colleagues, where an experience of each specialist will have the same value as the best evidence.