Digital pathology for reporting histopathology samples, including cancer screening samples - definitive evidence from a multisite study.
Ayesha S AzamYee-Wah TsangJenny ThirlwallPeter K KimaniShatrughan SahKishore GopalakrishnanClinton BoydMaurice B LoughreyPaul J KellyDavid P BoyleManuel Salto TellezDavid ClarkIan O EllisMohammad IlyasEmad A RakhaAdam BickersIan S D RobertsMaria Fernanda SoaresDesley A H NeilAbi TakyiSinthuri RaveendranEmily HeroHarriet EvansRania OsmanKhunsha FatimaRhian W HughesStuart A McIntoshGordon W MoranJacobo Ortiz-Fernandez-SordoNasir M RajpootBen StoreyImtiaz AhmedJanet A DunnLouise HillerDavid R J SneadPublished in: Histopathology (2024)
Comparing LM and DP CMC, overall rates exceed the reference 98.3%, providing compelling evidence that pathologists provide equivalent results for both routine and cancer screening samples irrespective of the modality used.