Crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and inter-action energy and DFT studies of 1-(1,3-benzo-thia-zol-2-yl)-3-(2-hy-droxy-eth-yl)imidazolidin-2-one.
Mohamed SrhirNada Kheira SebbarTuncer HökelekAhmed MoussaifJoel T MagueNoureddine Hamou AhabchaneEl Mokhtar EssassiPublished in: Acta crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications (2020)
In the title mol-ecule, C12H13N3O2S, the benzo-thia-zine moiety is slightly non-planar, with the imidazolidine portion twisted only a few degrees out of the mean plane of the former. In the crystal, a layer structure parallel to the bc plane is formed by a combination of O-HHydethy⋯NThz hydrogen bonds and weak C-HImdz⋯OImdz and C-HBnz⋯OImdz (Hydethy = hy-droxy-ethyl, Thz = thia-zole, Imdz = imidazolidine and Bnz = benzene) inter-actions, together with C-HImdz⋯π(ring) and head-to-tail slipped π-stacking [centroid-to-centroid distances = 3.6507 (7) and 3.6866 (7) Å] inter-actions between thia-zole rings. The Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structure indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H⋯H (47.0%), H⋯O/O⋯H (16.9%), H⋯C/C⋯H (8.0%) and H⋯S/S⋯H (7.6%) inter-actions. Hydrogen bonding and van der Waals inter-actions are the dominant inter-actions in the crystal packing. Computational chemistry indicates that in the crystal, C-H⋯N and C-H⋯O hydrogen-bond energies are 68.5 (for O-HHydethy⋯NThz), 60.1 (for C-HBnz⋯OImdz) and 41.8 kJ mol-1 (for C-HImdz⋯OImdz). Density functional theory (DFT) optimized structures at the B3LYP/6-311 G(d,p) level are compared with the experimentally determined mol-ecular structure in the solid state.